Impact Factor 2020: 1.226 (@Clarivate Analytics)
5-Year Impact Factor: 2.285 (@Clarivate Analytics)
Immediacy Index: 2.645
  • Users Online: 115
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 350-355

Prevalence and clinical significance of antiphospholipid antibodies among hospitalized COVID-19 patients


1 Rheumatology and Immunology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Indonesia
2 Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Indonesia
3 Basic Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Indonesia

Date of Submission10-Jun-2021
Date of Decision14-Jul-2021
Date of Acceptance15-Jul-2021
Date of Web Publication23-Jul-2021

Correspondence Address:
Tri Wahyudi Iman Dantara
Rheumatology and Immunology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya
Indonesia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1995-7645.321611

Get Permissions

  Abstract 

Objective: To describe the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and to find potential associations between antiphospholipid antibody positivity and clinical outcomes.
Methods: From September to November 2020, clinical and laboratory data were collected from 50 COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Saiful Anwar General Hospital in Malang, Indonesia. Antiphospholipid antibodies were measured by finding IgM anti-β2 glycoprotein, lupus anticoagulant, and IgM/IgG anticardiolipin. Clinical characteristics, thrombotic events, ICU admission, and mortality during hospitalization were recorded. Disease severity was defined by the Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of COVID-19, Indonesia.
Results: Among 50 patients, 5 patients (10.0%) were positive for antiphospholipid antibodies: 4 patients (80.0%) had IgM anti-β2 glycoprotein and 1 patient had IgG anti-cardiolipin (20.0%) and IgM anti-cardiolipin (20.0%), none of lupus anticoagulant was detected. Antiphospholipid antibodies were associated with anosmia (OR 8.1; 95% CI 1.1-57.9; P=0.018), nausea and vomiting (OR 12.4; 95% CI 1.2-122.6; P=0.010), diarrhea (OR 9.8; 95% CI 1.3-70.9; P=0.010), cardiovascular disease (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0-1.9; P=0.001), chronic kidney disease (OR 12.0; 95% CI 1.6-90.1; P=0.05), acute coronary syndrome (OR 29.3; 95% CI 2.0-423.7; P=0.001), moderate (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.01-1.10; P=0.031) and severe (OR 18.5; 95% CI 1.8-188.4; P=0.002) disease severity, and in-hospital mortality (OR 8.1; 95% CI 1.1-57.9; P=0.018). However, there is no correlation between the presence of antiphospholipid antibody and ICU admission.
Conclusions: In summary, the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 patients is low, mainly against IgM anticardiolipin, and is associated with an acute coronary syndrome, gastrointestinal manifestations, moderate and severe disease severity, and increased risk of mortality.

Keywords: Antiphospholipid antibodies; COVID-19; COVID-19 disease severity; Mortality


How to cite this article:
Wahono CS, Susianti H, Dantara TW, Rahman PA, Pratama MZ, Wulanda IA, Hartanti KD, Dewi ES, Handono K. Prevalence and clinical significance of antiphospholipid antibodies among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2021;14:350-5

How to cite this URL:
Wahono CS, Susianti H, Dantara TW, Rahman PA, Pratama MZ, Wulanda IA, Hartanti KD, Dewi ES, Handono K. Prevalence and clinical significance of antiphospholipid antibodies among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Asian Pac J Trop Med [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 24];14:350-5. Available from: https://www.apjtm.org/text.asp?2021/14/8/350/321611


  1. Introduction Top


In January 2020, a pneumonia outbreak caused by a novel coronavirus known as severe acute respiratory coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported in Wuhan, China[1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) proclaimed the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a global health emergency since the confirmed infected cases spread throughout the globe[2]. In the meantime, the infection has rapidly spread, resulting in a pandemic that has affected more than 4.8 million individuals worldwide. In May 2021, the most significant numbers of new cases in South-East Asia were reported from Indonesia (26 908 new cases; 212.2 new cases per 100 000; an 8% increase); the enormous numbers of new deaths were also reported (1 125 deaths; 0.4 news per 100 000)[3]. Similarly, venous thromboembolism (VTE) has become a major concern in COVID-19. A recent meta-analysis study showed an increased risk of mortality associated with high thromboembolism events in COVID-19[4].



COVID-19 infection was associated with alterations in coagulation markers in the early reports[5],[6]. A recent study shows that COVID-19 appears to have many coagulation abnormalities, including a significant increase in fibrin/fibrinogen breakdown products (i.e. D-dimers) and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Although the elevated D-dimer value is consistent with continued activation of the coagulation and fibrinolysis cascade, the combination of prolonged aPTT and arteriovenous thrombosis is unexpected. We have to remind clinicians of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-like clinical conditions[6],[7]. Several studies have attempted to explain the pathogenesis of thrombosis, one of which is the appearance of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies[8]. According to several recent studies, there is limited evidence on aPL antibodies in COVID-19 disease, and it is not clear whether they are incidental phenomena or whether they are related to any hemostatic abnormalities reported in COVID-19[9],[10].

There are many ways to drive virus-induced autoimmunity. The production of aPL antibodies in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 can be calculated by two possible pathogenesis: neoepitope formation and molecular simulation[11],[12]. These antibodies in COVID-19 mainly target β2GP1 and anticardiolipin (aCL)[9],[13]. However, several studies report that there are limited data on the occurrence of anti-phospholipid syndrome during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Positive antiphospholipid antibodies have been identified in a small number of patients. Their association with COVID-19 thrombotic events and clinical outcomes remains unclear[8],[9],[13]. Therefore, this study aims to discover the correlation between antiphospholipid antibodies and coagulation dysfunction, clinical manifestations, disease severity, and mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, especially in Indonesia.


  2. Subjects and methods Top


2.1. Study design and participants

This is a descriptive single-center cross-sectional study considering COVID-19 patients admitted to Saiful Anwar General Hospital in Malang, East Java, Indonesia, between September and November 2020. This study has been approved by the Malang Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Indonesia Ethics Committee (ethics number 400/194/K.3/302/2020). We randomly selected 50 confirmed COVID-19 cases from the general and intensive care unit (ICU). Our inclusion criteria were confirmed COVID-19 cases according to the WHO definition: real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) SARS-CoV-2 test results were positive, and respiratory tract specimens collected from nasopharyngeal swabs[14]. We excluded patients initially treated with heparin to reduce the interpretation bias of lupus anticoagulant [Figure 1].
Figure 1: The study flowchart.

Click here to view


2.2. Data collection

We collected patient demographic data, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and clinical outcomes. Data were collected from the patients’ medical records, including signs and symptoms, comorbidities, admission to ICU, and in-hospital mortality. COVID-19 severity is classified as mild, moderate, and severe based on the Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of COVID-19 in Indonesia[15]. Data were gathered comprehensively through a medical records review and communication with attending doctors and other health workers to fill in the missing data.

Thrombotic events, such as cerebrovascular accident (CVA), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism, were defined as the presence of arterial or venous thromboembolism (PE). The appropriate examination to evaluate subjects who were clinically suspected with thrombotic events to establish the diagnosis, such as radiology examination, electrocardiography (ECG) and cardiac enzyme panel were performed.

Laboratory examinations, such as complete blood count, coagulation test, liver and renal function, were all measured for first-time patients admitted to the hospital [Table 1]. The antiphospholipid antibodies, including lupus anticoagulant, IgM/IgG anticardiolipin, IgM anti-β32-glycoprotein, were examined by ELISA (Orgentec Diagnostika GmbH).
Table 1: Laboratory findings of hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Click here to view


2.3. Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were measured using percentages and frequency rates. Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean ± SD and not-normal variables were reported as interquartile range (IQR). A t-test was employed to compare normally distributed data; otherwise, the Mann-Whitney test was utilized. The Chi-square test was used to compare proportions for categorical variables, and the Fisher exact test was utilized when data was insufficient. In studying the parameters associated with the occurrence of aPL antibodies, bivariate analysis was used. Variables with a P-value <0.05 according to a bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.


  3. Results Top


3.1. Baseline characteristics of COVID-19 patients with and without antiphospholipid antibodies

We recruited 50 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 27 men (54.0%) and 23 women (46.0%), with an average age of (53.4 ± 14.4) years. The most common early signs and symptoms are dry cough (64.0%), shortness of breath (62.0%) and fever (60.0%). We found that the most common comorbidity in patients was diabetes (50.0%), followed by cardiovascular disease (34.0%), hypertension (32.0%) and chronic kidney disease (16.0%). We classify patients into mild (12.0%), moderate (64.0%), and severe (24.0%) based on the severity of COVID-19. Several manifestations of thrombosis have been reported: acute coronary syndrome (6.0%), cerebrovascular accident (6.0%), and deep vein thrombosis (4.0%) [Table 2]. The laboratory profile is shown in [Table 1]. In addition, 9 patients (18.0%) were admitted to the ICU ward due to mechanical ventilators, 40 patients (80.0%) were discharged, and 10 patients (10.0%) died [Table 2].
Table 2: Comparison between baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with and without antiphospholipids antibody.

Click here to view


3.2. Prevalence rates of aPL antibodies in COVID-19 patients

In our finding, from 50 patients with COVID-19, five patients (10.0%) had at least one circulating antiphospholipid antibody. The most frequently detected aPL antibodies were IgM anticardiolipin (80.0%) following by IgG anticardiolipin (20.0%), and IgM anti-β 2-glycoprotein (20.0%). Three patients are positive for IgM anticardiolipin, one patient is positive for IgG anticardiolipin, and one patient is positive for both IgM anticardiolipin and IgM anti-β 2-glycoprotein. No lupus anticoagulant was detected in this study.

3.3. Correlation of the clinical parameters in COVID-19 patients with antiphospholipid antibodies

The incidence of nausea and vomiting (80.0% vs. 24.4%, P=0.010), diarrhea (60.0% vs. 13.3%, P=0.010) and anosmia (60.0% vs. 15.6%, P=0.018) in COVID-19 patients with positive aPL antibodies statistically significantly higher than negative aPL antibody group, followed by fever, dry cough, shortness of breath, headache and chest pain, but there was no statistical difference (20.0%-80.0%, P<0.05). Interestingly, we found that all COVID-19 patients with aPL antibodies have cardiovascular disease (100.0% vs. 26.7%, P=0.001). In addition, There is a statistically significant higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease in aPL antibodies group as compared to negative aPL group (P=0.005) [Table 2]. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of aPL antibodies was significantly associated with a higher risk of nausea and vomiting (OR 12.4; 95% CI 1.2-122.6), diarrhea (OR 9.8; 95% CI 1.3-70.9), and anosmia (OR 8.1; 95% CI 1.1-57.9). Similarly, the risk of cardiovascular disease is higher (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0-1.9). Chronic kidney disease (OR 12.0; 95% CI 1.6-90.1) might be affected due to the presence of aPL antibodies [Table 3].
Table 3: Clinical parameters affected by antiphospholipid antibody positivity.

Click here to view


3.4. Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with antiphospholipid antibodies

Circulating aPL antibodies may aggravate the severity of COVID-19 disease. Our research shows that COVID-19 patients with aPL antibodies have a higher incidence of severe patients (80.0% vs. 17.8%, P=0.002), and a lower incidence of moderate patients (20.0% vs. 68.9%, P=0.031). COVID-19 without aPL antibody is classified as mild. We recorded thrombotic events that occurred during hospitalization. Our results show that the incidence of acute corona syndrome in COVID-19 patients with aPL antibodies is significantly higher than that of patients without aPL antibodies [Table 2]. Approximately 40.0% of COVID-19 patients with aPL antibodies are admitted to the ICU ward, but this is not significantly different from COVID-19 patients without aPL antibodies (P>0.05). We also found that COVID-19 patients with aPL antibodies have a higher mortality rate (60.0% vs. 15.6; P=0.018).

We performed multivariate analysis to measure the association of aPL antibodies with disease severity, thrombotic events, and mortality. We found that there were associations of aPL antibodies positivity in COVID-19 patients with a higher risk of severe degree (OR 18.5; 95% CI 1.8-188.4), lower risk of moderate degree (OR 0.11; 95% CI 0.01-1.10), higher risk of acute coronary syndrome events (OR 29.3; 95% CI 2.0-423.7), and higher risk of mortality (OR 8.1; 95% CI 1.1-57.9).


  4. Discussion Top


This descriptive single-center cross-sectional study was conducted in Malang, Indonesia. This study evaluated the prevalence of aPL antibodies in COVID-19 patients and its association with this patient subgroup’s clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes. Recent other single-center studies from China, Italy, and Mexico indicate that the prevalence of aPL antibodies in COVID-19 patients is low[9],[13],[16]. Similar to our findings, we studied the low incidence of aPL antibodies in COVID-19 patients, and the most commonly detected aPL antibodies are anticardiolipin and anti-β 2-glycoprotein. We also found that the presence of aPL antibody is significantly related to the severity of COVID-19. The pathophysiology of the hypercoagulable state of COVID-19 is still unclear, but it is proven that most severe and critically ill patients have coagulopathy[17]. However, in this study, no lupus anticoagulant was detected in all of our patients. In contrast with another recent study, it shows a more tremendous amount of lupus anticoagulant in COVID-19 patients but not in critically ill patients[18]. They are potentially biased due to heparin administration for hypercoagulable state prophylaxis[19].

Infection-induced aPL antibody production has been widely acknowledged[20]. The association between aPL antibody detection and SARS-CoV-2 viral infection remains unclear. The S1 may induce the generation of aPL antibodies, and the S2 subunits of S protein in the SARS-CoV-2 virus might produce a phospholipid-like epitope that stimulates the production of aPL antibodies[11]. A previous meta-analysis study reported a very high prevalence of aPL antibodies in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV), as well as gastrointestinal manifestation with COVID-19 infection[21],[22]. Our findings show that gastrointestinal manifestations (diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting) have a significant association with the presence of aPL antibodies in serum.

Interestingly, the latest study found that IgA anti-β 2-glycoprotein serum was the most common aPL antibody isotype in COVID-19. However, aPL antibodies may be temporary and disappear within a few weeks. As COVID-19 primarily affects the lung and intestines, preferential IgA isotype production could be linked to the breakdown of mucosal immune tolerance[13].

The circulating aPL antibody in COVID-19 has been considered to be one of the mechanisms leading to pro-inflammatory, hypercoagulable state and thrombotic events[23]. In this study, we found that aPL antibodies are present in many moderate and severe patients, which are associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease as comorbidities. Our study also reported an increased risk of thrombotic events. Approximately 40.0% of COVID-19 patients with aPL antibodies have the acute coronary syndrome, which is associated with a higher mortality rate. Although the aPL antibody in COVID-19 is related to disease severity and mortality, our findings and previous studies[8],[13],[19] found no significant association between aPL antibody and ICU admission. These findings suggest that aPL antibodies may be a marker of disease severity, thrombotic events, and mortality. Unfortunately, we cannot carry out long-term follow-up. There is still a lack of published evidence regarding the correlation between the presence of aPL antibodies and the clinical outcome of COVID-19. A prospective study of aPL antibodies in COVID-19 patients is urgently needed to investigate.

In conclusion, this study is a descriptive single-centered cross-sectional study that is conducted in Malang, Indonesia. The purpose is to evaluate clinical characteristics, disease severity, and clinical outcome of COVID-19 patients with aPL antibody. The COVID-19 pandemic is an emerging global health problem that has high mortality rates. A vast population in Indonesia and the high number of new cases and death rates due to COVID-19 are emerging problems for the local government. We reported that a slight prevalence of aPL antibodies in COVID-19 had been associated with specific gastrointestinal manifestations. In addition, it has an increased risk of acute coronary syndrome and an increased mortality rate. Further studies using a larger scale and multi-center are needed to see the prevalence of clinical survival of COVID-19 patients that have aPL antibodies for its application to alertness, management and therapy of COVID-19.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors affirm no conflict of interests in this study.

Authors’ contributions

C.S.W., H.S., and K.H. designed, directed and supervised the project. T.W.I.D. and M.Z.P. processed the experimental data, performed the analysis, and wrote the manuscript in consultation with C.S.W., H.S., and K.H. P.A.R. helped supervise the project and contributed to the draft interpretation of the results. I.A.W., K.D.H., and E.S.D. collected the data and performed the laboratorium analysis.

 
  References Top

1.
Zhang J, Dong X, Cao Y, Yuan Y, Yang Y, Yan Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy 2020; 75(7): 1730-1741.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Li H, Liu SM, Yu XH, Tang SL, Tang CK. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Current status and future perspectives. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020; 55(5): 105951.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
WHO. Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19-18 May 2021. Emergency Situational Updates. 2021. [Online]. Available from: https:// www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---18-may-2021. [Accessed on 19 May 2021].  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Malas MB, Naazie IN, Elsayed N, Mathlouthi A, Marmor R, Clary B. Thromboembolism risk of COVID-19 is high and associated with a higher risk of mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 29-30: 100639. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100639.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180(7): 934-943.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18(4): 844-847.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Garcia D, Erkan D. Diagnosis and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome. N Engl J Med 2018; 378(21): 2010-2021.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
El Hasbani G, Taher AT, Jawad A, Uthman I. COVID-19, antiphospholipid antibodies, and catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: A possible association? Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 13: 1179544120978667. doi: 10.1177/1179544120978667.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Amezcua-Guerra LM, Rojas-Velasco G, Brianza-Padilla M, Vázquez-Rangel A, Márquez-Velasco R, Baranda-Tovar F, et al. Presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19: A case series study. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 80(5): e73-e73.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Harzallah I, Debliquis A, Drénou B. Lupus anticoagulant is frequent in patients with Covid-19. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18(8): 2064-2065.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Tung ML, Tan B, Cherian R, Chandra B. Anti-phospholipid syndrome and COVID-19 thrombosis: Connecting the dots. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2021; 5(1): rkaa081.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Smatti MK, Cyprian FS, Nasrallah GK, Al Thani AA, Almishal RO, Yassine HM. Viruses and autoimmunity: A review on the potential interaction and molecular mechanisms. Viruses 2019; 11(8): 1-18.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Borghi MO, Beltagy A, Garrafa E, Curreli D, Cecchini G, Bodio C, et al. Anti-phospholipid antibodies in COVID-19 aredifferent from those detectable in the anti-phospholipid syndrome. Front Immunol 2020; 11: 584241. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.584241.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Yuki K, Fujiogi M, Koutsogiannaki S. COVID-19 pathophysiology: A review. Clin Immunol 2020; 215: 108427. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108427.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Indonesian Ministry of Health. Guidelines for the prevention and control of COVID-19 in Indonesia. National institute of health research and development. 2020. [Online]. Available from: https://covid19.kemkes. go.id/document/pedoman-pencegahan-dan-pengendalian-covid-19/view. [Accessed on 19 May 2021].  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Xiao M, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Qin X, Xia P, Cao W, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020; 72(12): 1998-2004.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395(10229): 1054-1062.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Maiese A, Manetti AC, La Russa R, Di Paolo M, Turillazzi E, Frati P, et al. Autopsy findings in COVID-19-related deaths: A literature review. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2021; 17(2): 279-296.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Taha M, Samavati L. Antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19: A meta-analysis and systematic review. RMD Open 2021; 7(2): e001580.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Mendoza-Pinto C, García-Carrasco M, Cervera R. Role of infectious diseases in the antiphospholipid syndrome (including its catastrophic variant). Curr Rheumatol Rep 2018; 20(10): 62.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Rokkas T. Gastrointestinal involvement in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol 2020; 33(4): 355-365.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Abdel-Wahab N, Talathi S, Lopez-Olivo MA, Suarez-Almazor ME. Risk of developing antiphospholipid antibodies following viral infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lupus 2018; 27(4): 572-583.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Abou-Ismail MY, Diamond A, Kapoor S, Arafah Y, Nayak L. The hypercoagulable state in COVID-19: Incidence, pathophysiology, and management. Thromb Res 2020; 194: 101-115. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.029.  Back to cited text no. 23
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Subjects and ...
3. Results
4. Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2546    
    Printed26    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded192    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal